Pourquoi nous ne publions pas de codes Koodo, Tangerine ou Amex
Nous ne publions pas de codes lorsque le programme réserve les invitations aux proches ou limite leur diffusion publique. Les règles officielles déterminent ce qui peut être partagé sur ce site.
Koodo et les relations personnelles
Les conditions du programme Koodo Référez un ami imposent que l’invitation provienne d’une personne que vous connaissez personnellement, via le lien officiel envoyé par courriel ou message texte. La diffusion publique sur des répertoires ou des forums enfreint ces règles et peut entraîner l’annulation de la prime.
La Clé Orange Tangerine
Le guide d’étiquette de Tangerine demande à ses clients de ne partager leur Clé Orange qu’avec des proches et proscrit le publipostage ou la diffusion publique massive. Par respect pour ces consignes, nous n’hébergeons pas de Clé Orange publique.
Les règles éditoriales d’abord
Lorsqu’une marque interdit le partage public, notre rôle consiste à vous expliquer comment obtenir légitimement une recommandation plutôt que de vous exposer à une déception ou à une annulation de récompense.
Read the permitted audience literally
“Friends and family” is a relationship requirement, not a description that a stranger can adopt by exchanging a message. If the current rules require a personal relationship, a public code directory cannot create that relationship for the visitor. The legitimate route is to ask someone you already know who is an eligible customer.
Consent also matters where the program requires it. Do not send repeated invitations to people who did not ask for them. A personal recommendation should be useful to its recipient, and the provider may specify how the invitation is delivered or accepted. Follow that process rather than improvising a shortcut.
Distinguish an owner’s page from a community forum
Some programs allow a customer to publish their own invitation on a page they control while restricting distribution on third-party sites. That is different from permission to host everyone else’s codes. Our editorial mode is designed to keep those cases separate from a public community pool.
An editorial label is not a blanket legal conclusion. The owner still needs to review the exact current program, country and distribution channel. When the official position is unclear, uncertainty must remain visible and publication should wait for an adequate review. Copying a practice from another website is not evidence that the practice is permitted.
Personal referral links and partner arrangements differ
Wise provides an example of why these channels should not be mixed. The supplied personal referral terms prohibit commercial use and publication on voucher or coupon platforms. A website partner arrangement is a separate relationship with its own rules, disclosures and approval requirements.
A site must not relabel an ordinary personal invitation as a partner link to avoid a restriction. Only a genuine approved partner link belongs in that position. If no partner arrangement has been configured, the page should simply explain the program without inventing a link or a commission relationship.
Other public directories do not set the rules
Search results can show many codes even for a restricted program. That tells you what has been published, not what the provider has authorized. A code can remain visible long after an offer changes or an account stops qualifying. Popularity and eligibility are different questions.
The same applies to copied terms. A summary can be a useful starting point, but the brand’s own current source should support the publication decision. Where supplied research is marked for verification, the relevant brand stays in draft until the owner performs that review.
What an explainer page should give you
You should be able to understand the restriction quickly, follow a link to the official terms and identify a legitimate next action. An explainer should not tease a hidden code, direct you to a private exchange with strangers or encourage you to misrepresent a relationship.
It should also distinguish a reward description from a current guarantee. Offers can vary by product, period and account. If you ask a friend for an invitation, both of you should read the provider’s instructions so neither person expects a reward that the actual conditions do not support.
Report a policy change constructively
If you notice a new official rule, send the official source through our contact form and explain which passage changed. Do not include someone else’s account details or private correspondence. A publicly accessible official source is easier to review consistently than an unsupported claim.
The owner can change a brand’s sharing mode and remove its code interface. That change must apply to the community pool and the owner’s ordinary referral display, not merely to a warning label. Program restrictions should affect the actual product behavior.
A useful recommendation can stop at an explanation
There is value in telling a visitor that a public code is not appropriate. It saves time, sets realistic expectations and directs the visitor toward an eligible invitation. A trustworthy directory does not need a copy button on every page to be helpful.